Is There No Beauty in Honest Mediocrity?

Let shallow, flat-butted men everywhere rejoice. Andrew Christian heard your pleas and has granted you underwear that is to your butt cheeks the equivalent of what a push-up bra is to a woman's bosom.

For a mere $29 you too can get even with women and impress men by letting them think your cajoled butt cheeks are firmer and rounder than they, in actuality, are.

Is there a moral issue here? If so, women can't complain given the amouont of make-up and push-up bras that they consume in order to fool men into thinking they look better than they do. Gay men might have a legitimate beef with the deception, unless they have padded their pants, too.

Are men who wear boxers more honest than those who wear briefs? Should automatic suspicion be our first impulse when we see a man in briefs? How do boxer briefs fit into the question?

How does this affect that tragic affliction in the gay community - Gay Glutes*?

The gay man's mind boggles at this, the underwear moral conundrum.

Is there no beauty in honest mediocrity? Let he without padded briefs cast the first stone.


*Gay Glutes are butt muscles that are overworked as compared to the rest of the person's body. Think bubble butt with sticks for legs and arms. Overworked pecs are naturally mandatory and are exempted in the Gay Glutes equation.